Friday, November 24, 2006

College Affordability (or Lack Thereof)

Some facts about the rising costs of higher education from the Debt Hits Hard Campaign:

Rampantly Unaffordable Costs

  • Over six in ten college graduates are burdened with educational debt. Of those, four in ten, and more than half of African-American and Hispanic borrowers, are burdened with an unmanageable level of debt. (Financial experts define unmanageable debt as the salary-to-debt threshold at which an individual is only able to repay his/her loans with significant economic hardship.)
  • Total student debt in the United States is more than $438 billion – and that’s not including private loans.
  • Between 2001 and 2010, 2 million academically qualified students will not go to college because they can't afford it.
  • The average student today graduates with debt almost three and a half times that of graduates a decade ago -- and enters a job market where the average job pays them less than it would have in 2000.
  • The general cost of living is increasing at a rapid pace. College textbooks, for instance, have tripled in price since 1986 and are becoming ever-larger culprits of student debt.
  • Because interest on loans grows fast, every dollar someone spends while living on student loans could cost $50 or more in the future.
  • The average college senior now graduates with $3200 in credit card debt and $18,900 in student loans.
  • Graduates of public colleges and universities accumulate almost as much debt as their peers at private institutions.


Stymied Possibilities

  • Student debt is outpacing the starting salaries of jobs in teaching and social work, making it virtually impossible for many debt-laden graduates to pursue careers in fields where they are desperately needed. Nearly one quarter of all graduates from public universities and almost 4 in 10 graduates from private universities have levels of student debt that would become unmanageable at the salaries of starting teachers.
  • More and more students are delaying major life decisions as a result of increased student debt. Thirty-eight percent of college graduates delay buying their first house because of debt, 14% delay marriage, 14% delay having kids. Compared to 1991, those figures have risen by margins of 52%, 75 % and 100%, respectively.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

You ain't kidding about the debt. NO Child Left Behind has meant all teachers going back to get masters degrees. I started teaching as a mid life career choice. Now after gaining the masters, I will be paying off loan debts beyond retirement. Or maybe I will never be able to retire. If the state requires us to get an advanced degree, then I think the govt ought to pay for it.

Chris said...

Teachers are undervalued and underpaid. The NCLB act was a nice idea, but wasn't it underfunded by about $9 billion last year?

Anonymous said...

This is one of my pet issues, and one of the reasons it was so important to get Strickland elected. I'm sure you and your readers realize that Ohio has fallen to damn near the bottom in college affordability, and all you have to do is use the Board of Regents own statistics to prove it.

I just blogged about this myself as the minority graduation rate among PhD's has fallen dramatically at Ohio State... just one of many effects of this problem with tuition.

My wife is at Wright State (wrong college, ha ha) and her tuition has gone up about 10% a year.

Thanks for highlighting this important issue; I will be linking it at my own site.

Chris said...

Thanks. I am quickly adopting this as a pet issue of mine as well, to help create awareness.

BTW, you both have nice blogs. Don, when you read this can you add thier blogs to our site? (or show me how) Here are the links:

http://longlivethevillagegreen.blogspot.com/

http://ohdave-brokenrecord.blogspot.com/index.html

Don said...

Hey, guys

Thanks for dropping by. Yeah, the education issue is foundational to so many other issues. In addition to the points Chris raises, I'm also concerned about the U.S. losing ground in science and technological innovation. Reducing barriers to higher education, it seems to me, is common sense public policy. How many smart Americans are being discouraged by the cost of education, and thus won't become the doctors, lawyers, or scientists of tomorrow? That's our collective loss, I'm afraid.

Democrats have to shout this from the rooftops. This is what "laissez-faire" means. This is the "ownership society" the Republicans would like to usher in. It means closed doors, and more barriers to upward mobility. It's not good for individuals, and it's certainly not beneficial for society as a whole.

Liberals have a different vision, which is why we advocate programs like the GI Bill, Pell grants, and super-low-interest student loans. Dems need to get on the ball and deliver the goods on education, particularly the problem of high college tuition.

BTW, V.G. and O.D., have you had a chance to check out the podcast?

Anonymous said...

Hey guys, thanks for the link (I didn't notice if you've done it yet, but thanks in advance. I am trying to get all of us Ohio liberal bloggers linking to one another. We have a lot of great blogs in the Buckeye State, I am discovering.)

You need to check out the Dayton Daily today... they have a pair of great articles on the subject of higher ed; you can go directly to DDN or see my most recent post on the subject. I am an educator so I blog about education a lot. I will also be posting a review of Jonathan Kozol's most recent book soon.

But I didn't mean to blogwhore, just pointing you all to the two excellent DDN sites. (I am a big fan of the DDN most of the time; there was also a great piece last week by Tom Archdeacon, the sportswriter, about schools in New Orleans... I am trying to get around to that as well.)